![]() It’s long been suspected that an informant betrayed the Frank family, but that person’s identity has remained a mystery for decades. The book’s author, Rosemary Sullivan, based the claim off research from retired FBI agent Vincent Pankoke as well as a note given to Otto Frank after the war.Ī new book suggests a Jewish notary gave away the location of Anne Frank and her family’s hiding place to the Nazis during World War II.įrank hid for two years in a secret annex above a warehouse in Nazi-occupied Amsterdam with her mother Edith, father Otto, sister Margot and four other Jewish friends until their discovery in the summer of 1944.įrank and her family were then deported to concentration camps, where only Otto Frank survived. After the war, Otto Frank went on to publish Anne Frank’s diary documenting the family’s time in hiding.Īmerica is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.“The Betrayal of Anne Frank” claims a Jewish man working as a notary in Amsterdam gave up Frank’s location to the Nazis.A new book claims to have a new lead on who might have given up the address of Anne Frank’s secret annex during World War II.It suggests illegal employment and ration-coupon fraud played a role and may have led to the discovery and subsequent deportation of the family. That research looks at why the Prinsengracht office was raided in the first place. In 2016, the Anne Frank House published its own research suggesting the Frank family may not have been betrayed when their hiding place was raided in August 1944 but that the secret annex was found by accident. There have been many theories about who betrayed Anne Frank and the seven others in hiding in the secret annex on Amsterdam’s Prinsengracht in 1944. You must not mark someone down in history as the betrayer of Anne Frank if you do not have conclusive evidence for this. This means that the conclusions go too far. ‘At the same time, it has to be said that key pieces of the puzzle concerning crucial aspects of the conclusions are missing from this cold case investigation. ‘It offers insights into the actions, choices and motives of people under extreme circumstances.’ ‘Research into the arrest of Anne Frank continues to be of great importance.’ said director Ronald Leopold. The Anne Frank House organisation in Amsterdam gave the researchers access to its files but was not involved in the book. ‘The problem is they come out with this accusation without providing any real evidence.’ In particular, she said, book is full of errors’ about the council. ![]() Laurien Vastenhout, a researcher at the NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, told the paper there is no evidence that the Jewish Council did have a list of names and addresses of people in hiding. The New York Times also published an article questioning the book’s findings. The Jewish Council was far too law-abiding to make such a list, I think.’ While I wonder whether he had access to a list of Jewish hiding places. ‘However, they are very firm in their conviction of that poor notary. ‘The researchers rightly subject their findings to all sorts of caveats,’ he told the paper. Since then, several critics have come forward to express their concerns about the ‘85% certain’ theory that a notary and member of the Jewish Council named Arnold van den Bergh handed a list of addresses where Jews were hiding to the Nazis out of self preservation.ĭavid Barnouw, co-author of the 2003 book Who Betrayed Anne Frank? told the Guardian he was not convinced. The deal prevented journalists from approaching other experts to check and verify facts in the new book, The Betrayal of Anne Frank, which nevertheless generated headlines around the world, and was the subject of a CBS documentary. ![]() Individual journalists who were given exclusive access to the book were asked to sign a secrecy agreement and told that they would be held personally liable for any leaks about it ahead of the agreed publication date, the paper’s book editor Wilma de Rek said in a column. The orchestrated publicity onslaught accompanying Tuesday’s new book about the betrayal of Anne Frank included very strict rules for journalists given an advance copy, the Volkskrant reported on Thursday. Experts question the latest Anne Frank betrayal theory JanuPhoto: The Anne Frank House complex in Amsterdam. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |